WebAug 19, 2015 · Appellee Han Tak Lee was convicted of murdering his daughter based primarily on scientific evidence that, as the Commonwealth now concedes, is discredited by subsequent scientific developments. Lee thus filed a § 2254 habeas petition claiming his conviction violated due process. The District Court granted habeas relief, and we affirm. WebJun 22, 2014 · That was the prosecution's case against the victim's father, Han Tak Lee, and it persuaded a jury to convict the South Korean immigrant of first-degree murder. He's serving life without...

HAN TAK LEE v. HOUTZDALE (2015) FindLaw

WebAug 22, 2014 · Han Tak Lee, 79, was escorted into federal court in Harrisburg after spending the past 24 years in a maximum security prison in Somerset County. The case … WebJun 16, 2014 · Han Tak Lee's trial was a parade of scientific errors and cultural miscommunications. First, the science: The state's case rested on claims once believed to be absolutely true in fire... john hammer construction salem oregon

Han Tak Lee - Innocents Database of Exonerations

WebDec 1, 2015 · Han Tak Lee faces reporters on Aug. 22, 2014, after 25 years in prison for the arson murder of his daughter. Fire science evidence that helped convict him has been … WebA well-known arson investigator offers a critique of the investigation and scientific testimony in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Han Tak Lee. The case is an interesting illustration of misleading expert testimony based on inconclusive data. WebUnlike Han Tak Lee, Hopkins does not point to any specific evidence in his case regarding the arson science testimony, how it was used, and why it was unreliable. Instead, Hopkins merely discusses how the science was found to be debunked and asserts that because some arson science was disproved, all arson science is unreliable. interbath handheld shower head